Schönheitsreparaturen: Must I Renovate When Moving Out? (2026)
Updated 6/14/2026 · HausMaus Redaktion
By law, Schönheitsreparaturen (cosmetic repairs) are the landlord's responsibility (§§ 535, 538 BGB). On move-out you only have to renovate if a valid clause in your Mietvertrag (lease) shifts that duty to you. The BGH (Federal Court of Justice) has struck down many such clauses: starre Fristen (rigid deadlines) are void, and if your flat was handed over unrenoviert (unrenovated) without adequate compensation, you owe nothing at all (BGH, 18 March 2015).
What are Schönheitsreparaturen – and do you have to do them?
By law, you do not have to renovate when you move out. Maintaining the rented property is the landlord's duty (§ 535 Abs. 1 BGB), and wear from ordinary, contractual use is also borne by the landlord (§ 538 BGB). A duty to renovate only falls on you if a valid Schönheitsreparaturen (cosmetic repairs) clause in the Mietvertrag (lease) shifts that duty onto you.
And this is the decisive point: in recent years the Bundesgerichtshof (BGH, the Federal Court of Justice) has struck down a great many of these clauses. If the clause in your contract is void, the duty falls back to the landlord – and you have to paint nothing on move-out.
Schönheitsreparaturen are narrowly defined. Under § 28 Abs. 4 of the II. Berechnungsverordnung, they cover:
- papering and painting walls and ceilings
- painting radiators and heating pipes
- painting interior doors, and windows and exterior doors from the inside
They do not include repairs to the building fabric, sanding parquet, filling a normal number of drill holes, or removing ordinary traces of use. That is wear and tear the landlord bears.
When is the clause in the Mietvertrag void?
If even one of the following applies, the Schönheitsreparaturen clause is, as a rule, void – and you owe nothing:
The flat was handed over unrenovated
If you took over the flat unrenoviert (unrenovated) at the start and received no adequate compensation for it (for example rent-free time or a clear reduction), then a clause imposing Schönheitsreparaturen on you is void. The BGH ruled this on 18 March 2015 (VIII ZR 185/14). The reasoning: otherwise you would have to repair the previous tenant's wear as well.
Important: in a dispute, you must prove that the flat was unrenovated at the start of the tenancy. An Übergabeprotokoll (handover protocol) with move-in photos is invaluable here.
The contract contains rigid deadlines
If the clause prescribes fixed renovation intervals – such as "kitchen and bathroom every three years, living rooms every five years" – regardless of the actual condition, it is void. Such starre Fristen (rigid deadlines) would force you to paint even when the flat still looks fresh. Only flexible wording such as "as a rule" or "depending on wear" is permitted.
There is a pro-rata payment clause
Some contracts require you, on an early move-out, to pay a share of the next renovation that is not yet even due. The BGH has likewise declared such Quotenabgeltungsklauseln (pro-rata payment clauses) void (18 March 2015, VIII ZR 242/13).
Important: A void clause does not just strike out the one offending point – it causes the entire Schönheitsreparaturen duty to fall away and revert to the landlord. In that case you do not have to paint on move-out. Do not sign a renovation agreement and do not pay any settlement before you have had your clause checked.
Valid or void? The quick comparison
| Wording in the Mietvertrag | As a rule |
|---|---|
| Flat handed over unrenoviert, no compensation | void |
| Rigid deadlines ("every 3 years, fixed") | void |
| Pro-rata payment on early move-out | void |
| Mandatory final colour (e.g. "white only, compulsory") | mostly void |
| Flexible deadlines ("as a rule", "depending on wear") | mostly valid |
| Flat handed over renovated, flexible clause | mostly valid |
Common mistakes tenants make
- Painting too soon. Many renovate voluntarily on move-out even though the clause was void – work (and money) you could have saved.
- Paying a settlement without a check. A landlord's demand in the Übergabeprotokoll is not a legal obligation. Check the clause first.
- No proof from move-in. Without photos or an Übergabeprotokoll from move-in, the unrenovated condition is hard to prove later.
- Confusing wear with damage. You never have to replace normal wear and tear – only genuine damage that goes beyond contractual use.
With HausMaus it's simpler
HausMaus is free for tenants and checks the Schönheitsreparaturen clause in your Mietvertrag. The app compares the wording against BGH case law and shows you whether your clause is likely void – for instance because of starre Fristen, a Quotenabgeltung, or a flat handed over unrenoviert. So before you move out, you know whether you actually owe any renovation at all – before you reach for a paintbrush or your wallet.
Frequently asked questions
Do I have to paint the flat when I move out?
Only if there is a valid Schönheitsreparaturen clause in your Mietvertrag. By law, renovating is the landlord's job (§ 538 BGB). If the clause is void, you do not have to paint.
I received the flat unrenovated – do I still have to renovate?
No. If the flat was handed over unrenoviert and you received no adequate compensation, the clause is void under BGH case law (18 March 2015, VIII ZR 185/14). In that case you owe no Schönheitsreparaturen.
What are starre Fristen and why do they void the clause?
Starre Fristen (rigid deadlines) impose fixed renovation intervals (e.g. 'kitchen every 3 years') regardless of the actual condition. The BGH has declared such clauses void because they would apply even to unused, undamaged rooms.
What actually counts as a Schönheitsreparatur?
Only papering, painting walls and ceilings, painting radiators, interior doors, and windows from the inside. Repairs to the building fabric, drill holes, or normal wear and tear are not included (§ 28 Abs. 4 II. BV).
Must I use a particular wall colour?
On move-out the BGH generally does not allow you to be forced into a specific colour, as long as you return the flat in a neutral shade (usually white). During the tenancy you may paint however you like.
Is a Quotenabgeltungsklausel valid?
No. The BGH has declared Quotenabgeltungsklauseln (pro-rata payment clauses) – which require you to pay a share of a not-yet-due renovation – void (BGH, 18 March 2015, VIII ZR 242/13).
Sources
This guide is based on the statute text and official sources. You can read the cited paragraphs in the original here: