CO₂ costs: does the landlord pay too? (CO2KostAufG 2026)
Updated 6/17/2026 · HausMaus Redaktion
Since 1 January 2023 tenants and landlords must share the CO₂ costs of heating (Kohlendioxidkostenaufteilungsgesetz, CO2KostAufG — the carbon-cost allocation act). For residential buildings a 10-step model applies (§ 5 CO2KostAufG): the worse the building's energy balance, the higher the landlord's share — up to 95 %. If your landlord fails to apply or correctly bill the split, you may reduce your heating-cost share by 3 % (§ 7 Abs. 4 CO2KostAufG).
What is the CO₂ cost split?
Fossil fuels such as natural gas and heating oil carry a CO₂ price in Germany — and it sits inside your heating bill. Tenants used to pay this surcharge alone. Since 1 January 2023 the Kohlendioxidkostenaufteilungsgesetz (CO2KostAufG) (carbon-cost allocation act) has changed that: tenants and landlords share the CO₂ costs.
The most important fact first: for residential buildings a 10-step model (§ 5 CO2KostAufG) decides who pays how much. The logic is fair — the worse a building is insulated and the more CO₂ it emits, the larger the landlord's share, because the landlord controls the insulation and the heating system.
The 10-step model for residential buildings (§ 5 CO2KostAufG)
What matters is the CO₂ emissions per square metre of living space per year. Depending on the value, one of ten steps applies:
| CO₂ emissions (kg/m²/year) | Tenant share | Landlord share |
|---|---|---|
| 52 and above | 5 % | 95 % |
| 47 to < 52 | 20 % | 80 % |
| 42 to < 47 | 30 % | 70 % |
| 37 to < 42 | 40 % | 60 % |
| 32 to < 37 | 50 % | 50 % |
| 27 to < 32 | 60 % | 40 % |
| 22 to < 27 | 70 % | 30 % |
| 17 to < 22 | 80 % | 20 % |
| 12 to < 17 | 90 % | 10 % |
| under 12 | 100 % | 0 % |
Rule of thumb: poorly insulated building = high landlord share. If you live in an energy-efficient new build, by contrast, you bear the CO₂ costs alone.
Your strongest lever: a 3 % reduction (§ 7 Abs. 4 CO2KostAufG)
It is the landlord who must calculate and deduct the share — not you. If the landlord fails to do so, or doesn't supply the necessary figures, you have a reduction right:
Achtung: If the landlord does not bill the CO₂ split, or does so without the required information, you may reduce your share of the heating costs by 3 % (§ 7 Abs. 4 CO2KostAufG). Assert the reduction actively and in writing to the landlord.
Step by step: how to check your share
- Look for the split. Is a CO₂ cost split shown in the Heizkostenabrechnung at all? If not, your 3 % reduction right applies.
- Check the emissions. Which value (kg CO₂/m²/year) is used, and which step does it fall into?
- Compare the step. Match the assigned step and landlord share against the table above.
- Verify the deduction. Was the landlord's share actually deducted from your heating costs — or merely shown but not offset?
- Mind the deadlines. As with any Nebenkostenabrechnung you have 12 months from receipt to raise objections in writing (§ 556 Abs. 3 BGB).
Residential vs. non-residential buildings
| Residential | Non-residential (commercial) | |
|---|---|---|
| Allocation | 10-step model (§ 5 CO2KostAufG) | 50/50 split (§ 8 CO2KostAufG) |
| Landlord share | 0–95 %, by CO₂ emissions | 50 % |
| Planned from 2025 | – | own step model |
Common mistakes
- No CO₂ split in the statement — although mandatory since 2023.
- Wrong step — the CO₂ emissions are understated, making the landlord's share too small.
- Share shown but not deducted — the relief never actually reaches you.
- Reduction right unused — you don't claim the 3 % under § 7 Abs. 4 CO2KostAufG.
HausMaus makes it easier
HausMaus is free for tenants and helps you check your Heizkosten- and Nebenkostenabrechnung item by item — including whether the CO₂ cost split under the CO2KostAufG is present and the landlord's share has been correctly deducted. The app shows you the 12-month deadline under § 556 BGB and, on request, drafts the matching objection if the split is missing or wrong. Wohnen, geregelt.
Frequently asked questions
Does my landlord have to contribute to the CO₂ costs?
Yes. Since 1 January 2023 the Kohlendioxidkostenaufteilungsgesetz (CO2KostAufG, the carbon-cost allocation act) requires landlords and tenants to share the CO₂ costs of heating. For residential buildings the share follows a 10-step model (§ 5 CO2KostAufG): the higher the CO₂ emissions per square metre per year, the larger the landlord's share — up to 95 %. The landlord must calculate this share and deduct it from your costs in the Heizkostenabrechnung (heating-cost statement).
How big is the landlord's share?
It depends on the building's CO₂ emissions per square metre of living space per year. With a very poor energy balance (52 kg CO₂/m²/year and above) the landlord bears 95 % and the tenant only 5 %. For a very efficient building (under 12 kg CO₂/m²/year) the tenant bears 100 % and the landlord 0 %. The remaining eight steps of the 10-step model lie in between (§ 5 CO2KostAufG).
What can I do if my landlord doesn't split the CO₂ costs?
If the landlord fails to bill your share, or does so without the required information, you may reduce the heating-cost share allocated to you by 3 % (§ 7 Abs. 4 CO2KostAufG). The condition is that the landlord did not carry out the split or did not provide the necessary information. Assert the reduction in writing to the landlord.
Where do I find the CO₂ split in my statement?
The split must be shown in your Heizkostenabrechnung or Nebenkostenabrechnung. Typically the billing service states the fuel quantity, the resulting CO₂ costs, the CO₂ emissions per square metre, the applicable step, and the landlord's share that was deducted. If this information is missing entirely, your 3 % reduction right under § 7 Abs. 4 CO2KostAufG applies.
Does this also apply to commercial premises?
Non-residential buildings do not use the 10-step model but (for now) a 50/50 split: tenant and landlord each bear 50 % (§ 8 CO2KostAufG). Agreements requiring the tenant to bear more than 50 % are void. A step model is also due to be introduced for non-residential buildings from 2025.
Sources
This guide is based on the statute text and official sources. You can read the cited paragraphs in the original here: